CVE-2026-42338: ip-address: XSS in Address6 HTML-emitting methods

Published May 5, 2026
·
Updated

Summary

Address6.group() and Address6.link() do not HTML-escape attacker-controlled content before embedding it in the HTML strings they return, and AddressError.parseMessage (emitted by the Address6 constructor for invalid input) can contain unescaped attacker-controlled content in one branch. An application that (1) passes untrusted input to Address6 and (2) renders the output of these methods, or the thrown error's parseMessage, as HTML (e.g. via innerHTML) is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. A related issue in v6.helpers.spanAll() produced malformed markup but was not exploitable; it is hardened in the same release for consistency.

Details

Four related issues were identified and fixed together:

1. Address6.group(): zone ID injection. The Address6 constructor stores the raw input (including any IPv6 zone ID) in this.address before zone stripping. group() then passed this.address to helpers.simpleGroup(), which wrapped each :-separated segment in a <span> element without HTML-escaping the content. A zone ID containing HTML markup was embedded verbatim. 2. Address6.link({ prefix, className }): attribute-value injection. link() concatenated user-supplied prefix and className into the href="…" and class="…" attributes without escaping. A caller passing untrusted content through these options could inject event handlers (e.g. onmouseover) and achieve XSS. 3. Address6 constructor: leading-zero IPv4 error path. The leading-zero branch in parse4in6() built AddressError.parseMessage by concatenating the raw address through String.replace(). Because parse4in6() runs before the bad-character check, any characters in the groups preceding the IPv4 suffix flowed into the error's HTML unescaped. Consumers who render parseMessage as HTML (its documented purpose — it already contains <span class="parse-error"> markup) could be XSS'd by a crafted input such as <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>:10.0.01.1. 4. v6.helpers.spanAll(): attribute-value injection (defense in depth). spanAll() embedded each character of its input into a class="digit value-${n} …" attribute without escaping. Because split('') limits n to a single character this was not exploitable in practice, but it produced malformed markup and is fixed for consistency.

Affected Versions

All versions up to and including 10.1.0.

Patched Version

10.1.1.

Impact

Real-world exposure is believed to be extremely limited. Analysis of all 425 dependent npm packages as well as GitHub code search found zero consumers of group(), link(), or spanAll(): these HTML-emitting surfaces appear to be unused across published npm packages and public repositories. Applications using only the address-parsing and comparison APIs (isValid, correctForm, isInSubnet, bigInt, etc.) are not affected.

Consumers who do render the output of group(), link(), spanAll(), or AddressError.parseMessage as HTML against untrusted input should upgrade.

PoC

javascript const { Address6 } = require('ip-address'); const addr = new Address6('fe80::1%<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>'); document.body.innerHTML = addr.group(); // fires the onerror handler in 10.1.0

Workarounds

If users cannot upgrade immediately:

- Do not pass untrusted input to the Address6 constructor, or - Never render the output of group(), link(), or spanAll(), nor the parseMessage field of any thrown AddressError, as HTML; treat these values as text only, or run them through DOMPurify before inserting into the DOM (DOMPurify's default configuration preserves the library's intended <span> wrapping while stripping any injected event handlers), or - Validate input with Address6.isValid() and reject anything that contains a zone identifier (a % character) or characters outside [0-9a-fA-F:/] before passing it to the constructor.

Lack of separate CVEs

Given the evidence that these methods are not used, and given that they are all of the same construction, maintainers do not think it's relevant or useful to create a separate CVE for each library method.

Credit

ip-address thanks @scovetta for reporting this issue.

Other sources

ip-address is a library for parsing and manipulating IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in JavaScript. Prior to 10.1.1, Address6.group() and Address6.link() do not HTML-escape attacker-controlled content before embedding it in the HTML strings they return, and AddressError.parseMessage (emitted by the Address6 constructor for invalid input) can contain unescaped attacker-controlled content in one branch. An application that (1) passes untrusted input to Address6 and (2) renders the output of these methods, or the thrown error's parseMessage, as HTML (e.g. via innerHTML) is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.1.1.

MITRE

Affected Software

3 affected componentsFixes available
npm/ip-address<=10.1.0
10.1.1
Beaugunderson Ip-address Node.js<10.1.1
IBM API Connect<=V10.0.8.0 - V10.0.8.9

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade npm/ip-address to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 10.1.1
  2. Upgrade

    Upgrade ip-address to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 10.1.1
  3. Configuration

    If you use untrusted input, do not insert the output of `Address6.group()`, `Address6.link()`, `v6.helpers.spanAll()`, or the thrown `AddressError.parseMessage` into the DOM via `innerHTML`/HTML rendering. Treat these values as text only, or run them through DOMPurify before inserting (DOMPurify default config preserves the intended `<span>` wrapping while stripping injected event handlers).

    Address6 usage HTML rendering of Address6.group(), Address6.link(), v6.helpers.spanAll(), and AddressError.parseMessage = Do not render as HTML; treat as text only or sanitize
  4. Configuration

    Before calling the `Address6` constructor with untrusted data, validate with `Address6.isValid()` and reject inputs that contain a zone identifier (a `%` character) or any characters outside `[0-9a-fA-F:/]`.

    Input validation for Address6 Reject zone identifiers and invalid characters before constructing Address6 = Reject any value containing '%' (zone ID) or characters outside `[0-9a-fA-F:/]`

Event History

May 5, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·09:50 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·09:50 PM
DescriptionWeaknessAffected Software
May 12, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·07:43 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·07:43 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·08:16 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Data Sourced
via Red Hat·09:02 PM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Jul 7, 2026
Data Sourced
via IBM·12:00 AM
DescriptionAffected Software

Parent advisories

This vulnerability appears in the following advisories.

Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-42338?

CVE-2026-42338 has a medium severity rating of 5.3 according to the CVSS score.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-42338?

To fix CVE-2026-42338, you should update the affected versions of the ip-address library to the latest patched version.

3

What does CVE-2026-42338 exploit?

CVE-2026-42338 exploits a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the HTML-emitting methods of the Address6 object.

4

Which software is affected by CVE-2026-42338?

CVE-2026-42338 affects the ip-address npm package, Beaugunderson Ip-address for Node.js, and IBM API Connect.

5

Is CVE-2026-42338 a critical vulnerability?

CVE-2026-42338 is not classified as critical; it is rated with a medium severity indicating a moderate risk.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203