CVE-2026-34829: Rack: Denial of Service via Unbounded Multipart File Upload Without Content-Length
Summary
Rack::Multipart::Parser only wraps the request body in a BoundedIO when CONTENTLENGTH is present. When a multipart/form-data request is sent without a Content-Length header, such as with HTTP chunked transfer encoding, multipart parsing continues until end-of-stream with no total size limit.
For file parts, the uploaded body is written directly to a temporary file on disk rather than being constrained by the buffered in-memory upload limit. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore stream an arbitrarily large multipart file upload and consume unbounded disk space.
This results in a denial of service condition for Rack applications that accept multipart form data.
Details
Rack::Multipart::Parser.parse applies BoundedIO only when contentlength is not nil:
ruby io = BoundedIO.new(io, contentlength) if contentlength
When CONTENTLENGTH is absent, the parser reads the multipart body until EOF without a global byte limit.
Although Rack enforces BUFFEREDUPLOADBYTESIZELIMIT for retained non-file parts, file uploads are handled differently. When a multipart part includes a filename, the body is streamed to a Tempfile, and the retained-size accounting is not applied to that file content. As a result, file parts are not subject to the same upload size bound.
An attacker can exploit this by sending a chunked multipart/form-data request containing a file part and continuously streaming data without declaring a Content-Length. Rack will continue writing the uploaded data to disk until the client stops or the server exhausts available storage.
Impact
Any Rack application that accepts multipart/form-data uploads may be affected if no upstream component enforces a request body size limit.
An unauthenticated attacker can send a large chunked file upload to consume disk space on the application host. This may cause request failures, application instability, or broader service disruption if the host runs out of available storage.
The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. Reverse proxies or application servers that enforce upload limits may reduce or eliminate exploitability, but Rack itself does not impose a total multipart upload limit in this code path when CONTENTLENGTH is absent.
Mitigation
Update to a patched version of Rack that enforces a total multipart upload size limit even when CONTENTLENGTH is absent. Enforce request body size limits at the reverse proxy or application server. Isolate temporary upload storage and monitor disk consumption for multipart endpoints.
Other sources
Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6, Rack::Multipart::Parser only wraps the request body in a BoundedIO when CONTENTLENGTH is present. When a multipart/form-data request is sent without a Content-Length header, such as with HTTP chunked transfer encoding, multipart parsing continues until end-of-stream with no total size limit. For file parts, the uploaded body is written directly to a temporary file on disk rather than being constrained by the buffered in-memory upload limit. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore stream an arbitrarily large multipart file upload and consume unbounded disk space. This results in a denial of service condition for Rack applications that accept multipart form data. This issue has been patched in versions 2.2.23, 3.1.21, and 3.2.6.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-34829?
CVE-2026-34829 is classified as a Denial of Service vulnerability.
How do I fix CVE-2026-34829?
To mitigate CVE-2026-34829, update your Rack version to 3.2.6, 3.1.21, or 2.2.23.
What systems are affected by CVE-2026-34829?
CVE-2026-34829 affects versions of Rack prior to 3.2.6, 3.1.21, and 2.2.23.
What type of attack does CVE-2026-34829 enable?
CVE-2026-34829 enables attackers to execute Denial of Service attacks through unbounded multipart file uploads.
Is there a workaround for CVE-2026-34829 if I cannot upgrade?
Currently, there is no recommended workaround for CVE-2026-34829; upgrading to a secure version is necessary.