CVE-2024-5535: SSL_select_next_proto buffer overread

Published Jun 27, 2024
·
Updated

Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSLselectnextproto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer.

Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSLselectnextproto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application.

The OpenSSL API function SSLselectnextproto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSLselectnextproto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSLselectnextproto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists).

This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSLselectnextproto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/clientlen parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/clientlen parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem.

In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSLselectnextproto function is accidentally called with a clientlen of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur.

This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely.

The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.

Other sources

OpenSSL: CVE-2024-5535 SSLselectnextproto buffer overread

Microsoft

We are republishing this OpenSSL CVE to document that the latest version Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has been updated to protect against this OpenSSL library vulnerability.

Microsoft

Affected Software

17 affected componentsFixes available
debian/openssl<=1.1.1w-0+deb11u1, <=1.1.1n-0+deb11u5, <=3.0.14-1~deb12u1, <=3.0.14-1~deb12u2
3.3.2-1
Microsoft CBL Mariner 2.0 x64
Microsoft CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Android
Microsoft Azure Linux 3.0 ARM
Microsoft Azure Linux 3.0 x64
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for iOS
IBM Cognos Analytics<=11.2.0
IBM Cognos Analytics<=12.0
IBM Cognos Transformer<=12.0
IBM Cognos Transformer<=11.2.4
IBM Cognos Transformer<=12.1.0
IBM Cognos Analytics<=11.2.0
IBM Cognos Analytics<=12.1.0
IBM Cognos Analytics<=12.0
IBM Cognos Transformer<=11.2.4
IBM Cognos Transformer<=12.1.0

Remediation

Recommended actions to resolve this vulnerability, in priority order.

  1. Upgrade

    Upgrade debian/openssl to a version that resolves this vulnerability.

    Fixed in 3.3.2-1

Event History

Jun 27, 2024
CVE Published
via MITRE·10:30 AM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·10:30 AM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·11:15 AM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via Red Hat·12:29 PM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Sep 13, 2024
Data Sourced
via Ubuntu·05:37 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Nov 12, 2024
Data Sourced
via Microsoft·08:00 AM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
May 26, 2026
Data Sourced
via IBM·05:05 PM
DescriptionAffected Software

Parent advisories

This vulnerability appears in the following advisories.

Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2024-5535?

CVE-2024-5535 is classified as a moderate severity vulnerability due to its potential impact on applications using OpenSSL.

2

How do I fix CVE-2024-5535?

To fix CVE-2024-5535, update your OpenSSL to version 3.3.2-1 or later if you are using an affected distribution.

3

What software is affected by CVE-2024-5535?

CVE-2024-5535 affects various versions of OpenSSL as implemented in products like Microsoft Azure Linux and Defender for Endpoint.

4

Does Microsoft Defender protect against CVE-2024-5535?

Yes, the latest version of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has been updated to protect against CVE-2024-5535.

5

What is the OpenSSL API function related to CVE-2024-5535?

CVE-2024-5535 is related to the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto when called with an empty supported client list.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203