CVE-2024-4741: Use After Free with SSL_free_buffers

Published May 29, 2024
·
Updated

A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, only applications that directly call the SSLfreebuffers function are affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by applications.

The SSLfreebuffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected to succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have been identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.

The first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the network and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived. In this case calling SSLfreebuffers will succeed even though a record has only been partially processed and the buffer is still in use.

The second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has been received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of this data. Again a call to SSLfreebuffers will succeed even though the buffer is still in use.

While these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a malicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs. We are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.

The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

OpenSSL 1.0.2 is also not affected by this issue.

OpenSSL 3.3, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL 3.3 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.3.1 once it is released.

OpenSSL 3.2 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.2.2 once it is released.

OpenSSL 3.1 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.1.6 once it is released.

OpenSSL 3.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0.14 once it is released.

OpenSSL 1.1.1 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1y once it is released (premium support customers only).

Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available. The fix is also available in commit e5093133c3 (for 3.3), commit c88c3de510 (for 3.2), commit 704f725b96 (for 3.1) and commit b3f0eb0a29 (for 3.0) in the OpenSSL git repository. It is available to premium support customers in commit f7a045f314 (for 1.1.1).

This issue was reported on 10th April 2024 by William Ahern (Akamai). The fix was developed by Matt Caswell and Watson Ladd (Akamai).

Other sources

Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSLfreebuffers may cause memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations

Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, only applications that directly call the SSLfreebuffers function are affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by applications.

The SSLfreebuffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected to succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have been identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use.

The first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the network and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived. In this case calling SSLfreebuffers will succeed even though a record has only been partially processed and the buffer is still in use.

The second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has been received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of this data. Again a call to SSLfreebuffers will succeed even though the buffer is still in use.

While these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a malicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs. We are not aware of this issue being actively exploited.

The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.

NVD

Affected Software

19 affected componentsFixes available
debian/openssl<=1.1.1w-0+deb11u1, <=1.1.1n-0+deb11u5
3.0.14-1~deb12u13.0.14-1~deb12u23.3.2-1
F5 Traffix SDC=5.2.0, =5.1.0
IBM Cloud Pak System<=2.3.4.0
IBM Cloud Pak System<=2.3.4.1 2.3.4.1 ifix1
IBM Cloud Pak System<=2.3.5.0
IBM Cloud Pak System<=2.3.6.0
IBM Os Image For Red Hat Linux Systems<=4.0.4.0 4.0.5.0 4.0.6.0 4.0.7.0
IBM Os Image For Red Hat Linux Systems<=5.0.0.0 5.0.1.0
Microsoft azl3 edk2 20240524git3e722403cd16-8
Microsoft cbl2 hvloader 1.0.1-5
Microsoft cbl2 openssl 1.1.1k-36
Microsoft cbl2 hvloader 1.0.1-5
Microsoft cbl2 openssl 1.1.1k-31
Microsoft cbl2 hvloader 1.0.1-6
redhat/openssl<3.3.1
3.3.1
redhat/openssl<3.2.2
3.2.2
redhat/openssl<3.1.6
3.1.6
redhat/openssl<3.0.14
3.0.14
redhat/openssl<1.1.1
1.1.1

Event History

May 29, 2024
Data Sourced
via Red Hat·09:07 AM
DescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Jul 5, 2024
Advisory Published
via F5·07:02 PM
Sep 13, 2024
Data Sourced
via Ubuntu·05:37 PM
RemedyDescriptionSeverityAffected Software
Nov 13, 2024
CVE Published
via MITRE·10:20 AM
Data Sourced
via MITRE·10:20 AM
DescriptionWeakness
Data Sourced
via NVD·11:15 AM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Nov 14, 2024
Data Sourced
via Microsoft·08:00 AM
DescriptionSeverityWeakness
Data Sourced
via Microsoft·08:00 AM
Affected Software
Updated
via Microsoft·08:00 AM
DescriptionSeverity
Updated
via Microsoft·08:00 AM
Description
Jan 30, 2026
Data Sourced
via IBM·12:00 AM
DescriptionAffected Software

Parent advisories

This vulnerability appears in the following advisories.

Free Weekly Intel

Don't miss critical vulnerabilities

Join thousands of security professionals who receive our weekly digest of trending CVEs, zero-days, and exploited vulnerabilities.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

1

What is the severity of CVE-2024-4741?

CVE-2024-4741 has the potential for severe consequences including data corruption, crashes, or execution of arbitrary code.

2

How do I fix CVE-2024-4741?

To fix CVE-2024-4741, update OpenSSL to the recommended versions specified in the advisory.

3

Which applications are affected by CVE-2024-4741?

Only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are affected by CVE-2024-4741.

4

What are the potential consequences of CVE-2024-4741?

The potential consequences of CVE-2024-4741 include corruption of valid data, application crashes, or the execution of arbitrary code.

5

Is CVE-2024-4741 a critical vulnerability?

Yes, CVE-2024-4741 is considered critical due to its potential to allow for arbitrary code execution.

Contact

SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
132 Wickham Terrace
Fortitude Valley,
QLD 4006, Australia
info@secalerts.co
By using SecAlerts services, you agree to our services end-user license agreement. This website is safeguarded by reCAPTCHA and governed by the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. All names, logos, and brands of products are owned by their respective owners, and any usage of these names, logos, and brands for identification purposes only does not imply endorsement. If you possess any content that requires removal, please get in touch with us.
© 2026 SecAlerts Pty Ltd.
ABN: 70 645 966 203, ACN: 645 966 203